Identification of clinically relevant dysglycemia phenotypes based on continuous glucose monitoring data from youth with type 1 diabetes and elevated hemoglobin A1c.

Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California. Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California. Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Pediatric diabetes. 2019;(5):556-566

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE To identify and characterize subgroups of adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and elevated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) who share patterns in their continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data as "dysglycemia phenotypes." METHODS Data were analyzed from the Flexible Lifestyles Empowering Change randomized trial. Adolescents with T1D (13-16 years, duration >1 year) and HbA1c 8% to 13% (64-119 mmol/mol) wore blinded CGM at baseline for 7 days. Participants were clustered based on eight CGM metrics measuring hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, and glycemic variability. Clusters were characterized by their baseline features and 18 months changes in HbA1c using adjusted mixed effects models. For comparison, participants were stratified by baseline HbA1c (≤/>9.0% [75 mmol/mol]). RESULTS The study sample included 234 adolescents (49.8% female, baseline age 14.8 ± 1.1 years, baseline T1D duration 6.4 ± 3.7 years, baseline HbA1c 9.6% ± 1.2%, [81 ± 13 mmol/mol]). Three Dysglycemia Clusters were identified with significant differences across all CGM metrics (P < .001). Dysglycemia Cluster 3 (n = 40, 17.1%) showed severe hypoglycemia and glycemic variability with moderate hyperglycemia and had a lower baseline HbA1c than Clusters 1 and 2 (P < .001). This cluster showed increases in HbA1c over 18 months (p-for-interaction = 0.006). No other baseline characteristics were associated with Dysglycemia Clusters. High HbA1c was associated with lower pump use, greater insulin doses, more frequent blood glucose monitoring, lower motivation, and lower adherence to diabetes self-management (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS There are subgroups of adolescents with T1D for which glycemic control is challenged by different aspects of dysglycemia. Enhanced understanding of demographic, behavioral, and clinical characteristics that contribute to CGM-derived dysglycemia phenotypes may reveal strategies to improve treatment.

Methodological quality

Publication Type : Randomized Controlled Trial

Metadata

MeSH terms : Glycated Hemoglobin